Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 4:25:15 GMT
In , the dominant revelation made by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry during their highly anticipated joint interview with Oprah Winfrey was that before the birth of their son, Prince Archie, "concerns and conversations" had been raised about the possible color of his fur. by anonymous members of the royal family. At the time, Meghan and Harry declined to name the royal family members who were involved in the talks. However, it was later clarified that it was not Queen Elizabeth II or her husband, Prince Philip. Following the interview's broadcast, a wave of anti-racist backlash was directed at the monarchy, with Buckingham Palace issuing an unusual statement calling the Sussexes' claims "particularly those related to race" "concerning.
Prince William came forward a few days later, responding Philippines WhatsApp Number List to a journalist's question about whether the royal family was racist with the comment: "We are not a racist family at all." The Duke of Sussex in Germany on And (inset) Harry with Meghan Markle during their interview with Oprah Winfrey in March . During their conversation with Winfrey, the couple revealed that "concerns and conversations" had been raised. about the skin color of their future children. Joshua Sammer Getty Images HARPO Productions In their Netflix docuseries and in Harry's book published after the Winfrey interview, neither couple mentioned conversations about skin color or who raised them.
In November , the publication of a new royal book by Meghan and Harry biographer Omid Scobie reopened the racism scandal when a Dutch translation appeared to name Charles and the Princess of Wales as participants in the talks. Scobie told readers he knew the names after they were included in an exchange of letters between the king and Meghan. The Dutch copies have been withdrawn from the market and the names do not appear in the English version. Scobie said he never included the names in any version of the book he produced, suggesting there had been an error in the Dutch translation. The translator later claimed that the names appeared in the manuscript they received from the editors to work on.