Post by account_disabled on Feb 18, 2024 4:33:54 GMT
In a new episode of the dispute between Disney and Florida, the entertainment giant has filed a lawsuit against the Republican governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, with the aim of challenging the state's actions to exercise control over Disney World, according to Reuters .
This legal action not only intensifies tension between the company and Ron DeSantis, who is also considered a possible candidate for the presidency of the United States, but also raises the issue of possible retaliation against the company after it expressed its opinion on an initiative that prohibits classroom discussion of sexuality and gender identity with younger children in that state.
Freedom of expression and CSR
The controversy erupted last year after Walt Disney Co criticized proposed regulations that prohibited teachers from talking about gender identity and sexual orientation at the preschool and elementary school levels. Disney considered this measure a restriction on freedom of expression and diversity.
«Many of these issues are not necessarily political. "It's about right and wrong."
Bob Iger, CEO of Disney.
In response to the entertainment giant's stance, DeSantis repeatedly attacked the company, referring to it as "Disney woke," an expression that alludes to a progressive stance that embraces certain values and narratives, in this case, in favor of human rights. of the LGBTQ+ community.
Furthermore, with the aim of exerting greater Middle East Mobile Number List control over the important tourist destination located in central Florida, legislators approved legislation that eliminated the virtual autonomy that Disney had in the region. This implied a loss of power and autonomy for the company in making decisions related to the operation and management of the Disney World theme parks.
Disney vs Florida
In response to the government's actions against Disney, the company has filed a lawsuit in federal court in Tallahassee seeking to protect its employees, guests and developers from possible "retaliation for expressing a political point of view unpopular with certain state officials." ».
"Disney is now forced to defend itself against a state that weaponizes its power to inflict political punishment."
Walt Disney Co.
The company is asking the court to declare the legislative action taken by the state of Florida illegal, which would mean that the measures taken against Disney should be considered invalid. According to Disney, a newly formed tourism board appointed by Governor DeSantis has violated the company's contractual rights by affecting previously established agreements, without providing fair compensation or following proper legal process.
DeSantis has argued that Disney, which employs approximately 75,000 people in Florida, has been enjoying unfair advantages for decades. A spokesperson added: "We are unaware of any legal right a company has to operate its own government or maintain special privileges."
The dispute between Disney and Florida has been a central theme in the current governor's speeches as he tours the United States ahead of his expected presidential bid. Former President Donald Trump, the favorite for the Republican nomination, has criticized DeSantis' stance, stating on social media that the governor "is being destroyed by Disney" and warning that the company would reduce its investments in Florida.
Dispute over freedom of expression
The case of Disney vs. Florida could boost support for DeSantis among US Republican voters, a Reuters/Ipsos poll reveals . However, it could also hurt him in the broader electorate.
73% of respondents, including 82% of Democrats and 63% of Republicans, said they would be less likely to back a political candidate who supported laws designed to punish a company for its political or cultural stances.
The judge in charge of the Disney vs. DeSantis is U.S. District Judge Mark Walker, who has previously struck down several laws that were part of the governor's conservative political agenda. These laws included restrictions on the speech of university professors, limitations on protests, and restrictions on voting access.
Ultimately, the resolution of this conflict may set an important precedent for the role of companies in upholding and respecting human rights as part of their social responsibility . Protecting human rights progress has a positive impact on both society and business. Likewise, it also raises questions about the role of the state, which, as the highest authority, uses its power to coerce a company for its political or cultural positions.
This legal action not only intensifies tension between the company and Ron DeSantis, who is also considered a possible candidate for the presidency of the United States, but also raises the issue of possible retaliation against the company after it expressed its opinion on an initiative that prohibits classroom discussion of sexuality and gender identity with younger children in that state.
Freedom of expression and CSR
The controversy erupted last year after Walt Disney Co criticized proposed regulations that prohibited teachers from talking about gender identity and sexual orientation at the preschool and elementary school levels. Disney considered this measure a restriction on freedom of expression and diversity.
«Many of these issues are not necessarily political. "It's about right and wrong."
Bob Iger, CEO of Disney.
In response to the entertainment giant's stance, DeSantis repeatedly attacked the company, referring to it as "Disney woke," an expression that alludes to a progressive stance that embraces certain values and narratives, in this case, in favor of human rights. of the LGBTQ+ community.
Furthermore, with the aim of exerting greater Middle East Mobile Number List control over the important tourist destination located in central Florida, legislators approved legislation that eliminated the virtual autonomy that Disney had in the region. This implied a loss of power and autonomy for the company in making decisions related to the operation and management of the Disney World theme parks.
Disney vs Florida
In response to the government's actions against Disney, the company has filed a lawsuit in federal court in Tallahassee seeking to protect its employees, guests and developers from possible "retaliation for expressing a political point of view unpopular with certain state officials." ».
"Disney is now forced to defend itself against a state that weaponizes its power to inflict political punishment."
Walt Disney Co.
The company is asking the court to declare the legislative action taken by the state of Florida illegal, which would mean that the measures taken against Disney should be considered invalid. According to Disney, a newly formed tourism board appointed by Governor DeSantis has violated the company's contractual rights by affecting previously established agreements, without providing fair compensation or following proper legal process.
DeSantis has argued that Disney, which employs approximately 75,000 people in Florida, has been enjoying unfair advantages for decades. A spokesperson added: "We are unaware of any legal right a company has to operate its own government or maintain special privileges."
The dispute between Disney and Florida has been a central theme in the current governor's speeches as he tours the United States ahead of his expected presidential bid. Former President Donald Trump, the favorite for the Republican nomination, has criticized DeSantis' stance, stating on social media that the governor "is being destroyed by Disney" and warning that the company would reduce its investments in Florida.
Dispute over freedom of expression
The case of Disney vs. Florida could boost support for DeSantis among US Republican voters, a Reuters/Ipsos poll reveals . However, it could also hurt him in the broader electorate.
73% of respondents, including 82% of Democrats and 63% of Republicans, said they would be less likely to back a political candidate who supported laws designed to punish a company for its political or cultural stances.
The judge in charge of the Disney vs. DeSantis is U.S. District Judge Mark Walker, who has previously struck down several laws that were part of the governor's conservative political agenda. These laws included restrictions on the speech of university professors, limitations on protests, and restrictions on voting access.
Ultimately, the resolution of this conflict may set an important precedent for the role of companies in upholding and respecting human rights as part of their social responsibility . Protecting human rights progress has a positive impact on both society and business. Likewise, it also raises questions about the role of the state, which, as the highest authority, uses its power to coerce a company for its political or cultural positions.